add nextflow d30e48d

nextflow/specs/260410-fusion-gpu-metrics/checklists/requirements.md

@@ -0,0 +1,35 @@
+# Specification Quality Checklist: Fusion GPU Metrics Collection
+
+**Purpose**: Validate specification completeness and quality before proceeding to planning
+**Created**: 2026-04-10
+**Feature**: [spec.md](../spec.md)
+
+## Content Quality
+
+- [x] No implementation details (languages, frameworks, APIs)
+- [x] Focused on user value and business needs
+- [x] Written for non-technical stakeholders
+- [x] All mandatory sections completed
+
+## Requirement Completeness
+
+- [x] No [NEEDS CLARIFICATION] markers remain
+- [x] Requirements are testable and unambiguous
+- [x] Success criteria are measurable
+- [x] Success criteria are technology-agnostic (no implementation details)
+- [x] All acceptance scenarios are defined
+- [x] Edge cases are identified
+- [x] Scope is clearly bounded
+- [x] Dependencies and assumptions identified
+
+## Feature Readiness
+
+- [x] All functional requirements have clear acceptance criteria
+- [x] User scenarios cover primary flows
+- [x] Feature meets measurable outcomes defined in Success Criteria
+- [x] No implementation details leak into specification
+
+## Notes
+
+- All items pass. Spec references internal Nextflow concepts (TraceRecord, TowerObserver) by necessity since this is an internal infrastructure feature, but avoids prescribing implementation approach.
+- The `resourceAllocation` pattern reference in FR-003 is a design constraint from the user, not an implementation detail leak.